One record, traced to the rule

Core Creek reads a regulated record against the rule that governs it and recovers what is missing from its source. The error it catches is one a match-rate system would have passed: the match looked clean, so the record was never questioned. The engine is deterministic, not a language model, so the same inputs reproduce the same result under examination.

Illustrative model·Synthetic data, no real records

The clean miss

A match that passed, traced to the error it hid.

Examination File

in review

Element	Basis	Source	Status
Scope	The examination is illustrative and synthetic. The engine is deterministic; the same inputs reproduce the same result.

The practice

Three questions a book of records has to answer.

Who is the person?One record, traced to the ruleOn this page Is the person alive?The two errors in every death matchDemonstration What are they owed?The cost of an open capture-rate gapDemonstration

One record is the method. The book is the scale.

Run across a book, the same method produces a single Examination File, each record traced from its recovered identity to the rule that governs it, reproducible years later. An examiner reads it instead of taking the institution’s word for the result. The engine is deterministic, not a language model. Core Creek earns nothing from what the file sets in motion, so the only thing at stake in it is whether it is right.

An Examination File takes the method to your whole book and returns, for every record, the steps that produced the result and the rule it answers to. It is built to stand on its own years later, in front of your examiner or counsel.

Request an Examination File